The stakes could hardly be higher for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.
Just three months before the biggest test of his political career, a massive 7.8-magnitude earthquake rocked Turkey and Syria, killing more than 16,000 people.
On May 14, Turkey will vote in presidential and parliamentary elections that polls conducted before the disaster showed would turn into a tight race for Erdoğan, who has led the country since 2003.
And even before disaster struck in the pre-dawn hours of Monday, Erdoğan was trying to put out a series of crises at the same time.
His unconventional approach to economics has set off an inflationary spiral that saw consumer prices soar by 85 percent in annual terms last year.
At the same time, his government has been swatting away accusations of cronyism, corruption and bungling the response to environmental disasters, including wildfires in 2021.
Appearing to understand the challenge, Erdoğan is fighting back.
Hours after the earthquake, he took center stage at a press conference in Ankara — one of many that followed in the next three days.
On Wednesday, he hugged a weeping woman affected by the quake near its epicenter in the province of Kahramanmaraş before paying a visit to Hatay, where the death toll is even higher.
He even acknowledged his government’s “shortcomings” during the Hatay visit, but insisted it was “not possible to be ready for a disaster like this.”
1999 shambolic response
Erdoğan no doubt remembers it was Turkey’s last major earthquake, in 1999, that catapulted his party to victory in 2002 after promises of better governance.
The then-prime minister Bülent Ecevit came under heavy criticism for bungling the 1999 relief effort.
After Monday’s quake hit, Turkey swiftly declared a level four emergency that calls for international assistance. Support from dozens of countries — including regional rivals — has swiftly poured in.
Experts say Erdoğan could strengthen his position if he manages the crisis well. But failure could see him suffer the fate of Ecevit.
“An effective emergency response may even strengthen the AKP leader and its party by triggering a sense of national solidarity under Erdoğan’s leadership,” Wolfango Piccoli of the London-based political risk consultancy Teneo said.
“However, the large scale of the earthquake -– ten southern provinces were hit -– will pose a significant challenge to the government,” he added in a note.
“If the post-earthquake response is not successful, Erdoğan could lose the elections in May,” said Emre Çalışkan, a research fellow at the UK-based Foreign Policy Centre.
‘Weakened’ state institutions
Frustration is building in southern Turkey. Many destitute families lashed out at the government for failing to reach them and save their loved ones from the rubble.
Others waited for more than 24 hours for state relief workers to provide food and shelter.
Analyst Gönül Tol, who was in Turkey at the time of the quake and lost relatives in the tragedy, said the anger was palpable in Hatay, one of the most affected provinces.
“I cannot imagine him (Erdoğan) not being impacted by this because of the level of frustration, I saw that anger firsthand. I am sure it will have an impact,” said Tol, who is the Turkey program director at the US-based Middle East Institute.
Tol also said that in 1999, civil society organizations worked tirelessly to help victims.
This time, there are fewer because Erdoğan has cracked down on many in the wake of a failed 2016 coup.
“Twenty years later, we are in no better place,” she told AFP. “Erdoğan has not only weakened state institutions but he also weakened Turkish civil society.”
Erdoğan, however, faces no criticism from most mainstream media, experts pointed out, giving the president an obvious advantage over the opposition.
News channels have reported very little on the impact of poor construction after homes crumbled, including those built only six months or a year ago.
Yet after the 1999 disaster, the government had introduced construction regulations to ensure new buildings would survive big tremors.
“The opposition says that the number of earthquake-related deaths were not just due to natural disaster, but the result of poorly regulated and bad quality construction,” Çalışkan said, adding that opponents put the blame squarely on the government.
Within days of the 1999 quake, newspapers slammed the government over the response. Not so this time.
“A largely supportive domestic media also means that Erdoğan will manage the narrative and could benefit from the situation,” Economist Intelligence Unit’s senior Europe consultant Adeline Van Houtte said in a note.
© Agence France-Presse